Great Central Railwayana have a new auction coming up on 4th June, and the catalogue is now up on The Salesroom if you want to take a peek.
There are a couple of quite desirable items on there, my favourite probably being this Tom Purvis because – as any regular readers may have worked out – I am somewhat obsessed with the idea of camping coaches.
Tom Purvis, 1930s, est. £600-900
That does make it look particularly fun though.
I’m always a sucker for a nice Lander, and there are two good ones up this time round.
This, meanwhile, is of the same kind of vintage but a) is by someone called Harris about whom I know nothing, and b) isn’t actually a railway poster at all.
Meanwhile, after years of invisibility, another copy of this has popped up six weeks after the last one. I will tell you all about Armengol one of these days, I promise.
You need to pay attention to this one too, because I also will be writing more about this series in the next week or so. And it’s rather good to boot.
Langhammer, c.1960, est £150-300
Meanwhile this one may not be the best bit of design ever, but seeing as it both dates from 1946 and isn’t actually a railway poster, I reckon it’s probably quite rare.
Finally, this is worth a mention simply for making explicit the thought process behind so many landscape-depicting railway posters.
Ronald Lampitt, c. late 1950s, est. £100-200.
In an interesting development, Lampitt has his own Twitter account. Life is a perpetual source of surprise to me.
While all those posters are very lovely, they’re not the most interesting discoveries about this auction. When I went onto the Great Central site to look at what posters they had, the link, accidentally, took me to the auction just gone past in March. It took me a few clicks to work out what had happened, which meant that I ended up looking at quite a few sold prices. And those turned out to be really rather interesting.
Quite a lot of ‘classic’ railway posters went pretty much for their estimates. I’ve pulled this one out simply as an example.
The estimate was £200-350, and it sold for £260. All fine and well there.
Here’s another, later example, which went for £360, with a top estimate of £300
I reckon that a good two thirds of the sale went in this way. A couple came in under and only one failed to sell at all. A normal day at the auction house.
That is, except for the posters that remained – perhaps ten or fifteen – where the bidding went mental. Estimates were being smashed all over the place.
Sometimes this can be accounted for by a poster being old and rare.
Hewins, est. £400-600, sold for £1,300
While others were design classics of one kind or another.
Frank Newbould, est. £150-300, sold for £1050
Daphne Padden, est. £80-120, sold for £270
This is a really stylistically interesting and unusual poster, and the only example I’ve ever come across of the design at auction, so I can see why it went so high.
Dickens, 1960, est. £150-300, sold for £780.
Other posters behaved less explicably. Why is this seaside poster better than any other?
Anon, est. £100-200, sold for £460.
These boats don’t look particularly exceptional either, but people seem to want them.
A J Wilson, est £100-200, sold for £500.
There is a theme developing here, which is that posters of the Lancashire coast go for a lot of money. It’s a good theory, but doesn’t account for everything.
Frank Mason, est. £150-30o, sold for £540
While nothing at all can account for this.
Norman Wilkinson, est. £250-400, sold for £1800
I know, people like pictures of trains, and signal boxes, but I still find it bewildering.
So what have we learned from my trawl through auctions past? I’m not entirely sure, to be honest. One interpretation might be that the market is moving upwards a bit. That’s certainly true from the point of view of the railwayana auctioneers. Ten or fifteen years ago, posters were a small and rather disregarded sideline for them: now they are bringing in serious money.
But making a generalisation about values as a whole, I’m less sure about. The other piece of auction news that has come in recently is that Christies are closing down their entire poster department. On the one hand this, to paraphrase Morrissey, says nothing to me about my life. I can’t afford the prices, and don’t want most of the posters in their sales. I’m not even sure it’s a vote of any kind about the market; I suspect this is more about posters being small fry compared to the Very Expensive Art that they would prefer to sell.
So all I am left with is questions? Are posters getting cheaper or more expensive? Who’s going to sell the expensive posters now – are they all going to go at Railwayana auctions? And where will the London Transport Museum get rid of their surplus holdings now?
Any answers, please do type them out in the box below, because I certainly don’t know.
Poster prices at railwayana auctions are also influenced by rather esoteric points, like the identity of the commissioning railway company or the literal representation of locomotives and infrastructure. Even so, you’re a bit hard on Wilkinson’s moody image of Willesden. It really is very impressive in the ‘flesh’, although loses something as a thumbnail.
I know what you mean, and I think that is certainly true for the Wilkinson picture (which is, however lovely, still a picture of a signal box and therefore very interesting to some people and not quite as appealing to others).
My impression from the other prices though is that a new kind of buyer is now finding their way into the railwayana auctions. I can’t bring myself to believe that these hefty increases have happened because the railwayana collectors have suddenly discovered they like posters, when less than 10 years ago they were hardly willing to pay anything for them (and we used to get lovely bargains as a result).
Camping Coaches posters seem to have a monied following, a little ironic as they were aimed at families who could not afford the luxuries of hotels.
The Yorkshire Coast Lander is unusual, as it does not have the red railway lines, unlike all other examples I have seen, which does make it seem a bit bare in the middle, while the Butlins lady looks a bit over-optimistic re the weather in April !
As for prices; Frank Mason has a definite follwing, as it seems does Morecambe. The Willesden one does seem rather steep, until you look at what it sold for in the Malcolm Guest sale – £2400. So you could even argue that this time it was a bargain!
Otherwise I am left with pretty much the same questions as you!
I agree with all of that, but particularly about Butlins Woman. That umbrella and hot water bottle are just what she needs…
And that Willesden poster will never be a bargain in my mind, but each to their own.
To me, the Wilkinson ‘Willesden No.7 Box’ poster simply oozes with a superfluity of atmosphere; but perhaps it does require one to have had the experience of that bygone age at first hand, in order to fully empathise with the artist’s statement in his contemporary account of it.
There was always a sense of occasion surrounding long distance rail travel, where friends and relatives would throng the platforms of departing expresses, to wave last goodbyes to those much envied passengers boarding the train. This poster was an appendix to that now lost romance of travelling into the night, by steam train.
Today, with the clean and clinical efficiency of anonymous trains, where rail travel is more akin to getting on and off a bus, it is, perhaps, easy to see why this poster, from a very different age, may be viewed as just another old painting of a signal box, and quite meaningless??
In 1923, it was Norman Wilkinson R.I., who first suggested that Academy artists should be commissioned to design a series of railway posters for the LMS. The first of them appeared in 1924, and among them was the (now quaint) illustration of the LMS Railway ‘Permanent Way’ by Stanhope A.Forbes R.A.
In fascinating contrast, Wilkinson’s stunning poster ‘Tilbury For The Continent’, (featuring the ‘S.S.Picard’ leaving Tilbury Marine for Dunkerque, in a gloaming twilight, and my personal favourite) is a reminder that he, himself, was just one of many renowned artists whose masterpieces were to endow windswept railway platforms, and dreary railway waiting rooms, with high art worthy of display in a gallery! Other contributions in the series being: ‘Speed’ by Sir Bertram Mackennal, R.A., ‘Steel’ by Richard Jacks, R.A., ‘Coal’ by G Clausen, R.A., ‘Stirling’ by Sir D.Y.Cameron, R.A., ‘Carlisle’ by Maurice Greiffenhargen, and ‘Night Mail’, by Sir William Orpen, R.A. There must be others, too, that I’ve now forgotten!
Elsewhere, with the accent on streamlining very much in vogue, Frank Newbould’s striking ‘Silver Jubilee’ was produced for the L.N.E.R., and for the Southern Railway, Leslie Carr’s equally dramatic stylising of a speeding train. But the devil is always in the detail, and for the much promoted handful of famous, crack expresses, there were thousands of other train services running to a more perfunctory schedule!
I spent a most enjoyable day, yesterday, reading through so many of your most interesting posts and informative topics. (Together with the associated comments.) Anyway, cf, thank you for tolerating my somewhat rambling contributions to your comments; your page is now bookmarked, and I may look in again at some point. But for now, it is good-bye, and thanks for having me! B.